For the last two months, the UTMSU has held caucus meetings during which select student club presidents and UTMSU executives discussed who should run for the UTMSU election that will take place two weeks from today. After the last meeting on February 9, VP Equity Vickita Bhatt was chosen as the unofficial candidate for the presidency, said three participants of the meeting. Bhatt neither confirmed nor denied this, saying only that she had met with individuals regardless of their position at UTM.
During the meetings, UTMSU executives encouraged select club presidents to ask questions and vote on who they believed should run for president of the UTMSU. But according to Henry Ssali, current VP External and now an independent candidate for the presidency, the vote was “already skewed to [VP Equity] Vickita Bhatt.”
Current UTMSU executive Maria Pilar Galvez joined Bhatt and Ssali in seeking out support from UTMSU and club executives during these meetings, which were held in the South Building Antechamber on three separate occasions: January 27, February 4 and February 9.
The group ruled out Pilar Galvez as presidential candidate during the second meeting on February 4, said attendants of the meeting. A tie vote between Ssali and Bhatt led the group to call a third meeting on February 9 to hear from these two candidates again.
Finally, a majority of the caucus group, which was primarily made up of club presidents, cast its vote in Bhatt’s favour.
Among club presidents who came to these meetings were Baptist Student Ministries president Jonathan Wahab, Carribean Connections president Delphino Gilbert Cassar, II, Erindale Chinese Student Association president Kenneth Peng, Erindale College African Student Association president Adekunie Ajisebutu, Hindu Student Council president Garima Bhatt, Muslim Students Association president Fahad Tariq and CCIT Council president Stephanie Chan.
HSC president Garima Bhatt, who was part of the “caucus” group, admitted that she was “surprised when asked to be part of it by UTMSU.” As to why the group decided to support the current UTMSU VP Equity, the HSC president said that there had been “deliberation” as well as “speeches and discussion.” Moreover, she maintained that the HSC has not officially endorsed a candidate despite the caucus’s decision.
MSA president Fahad Tariq claims he was asked to be part of the caucus group by UTMSU executives because “our club is large. We were helping in the decision-making process. We just voted on who the UTMSU executives [who are not running] should endorse.” With roughly 1,000 members, the MSA is one of the largest clubs on campus.
According to Tariq, the MSA has not officially selected a candidate to endorse. The president claims that the club remains open to meeting all candidates and will officially endorse a presidential candidate once they meet with everyone during the campaign period.
When a campus student club endorses a candidate, executive members communicate their endorsement through Facebook messages and emails to all its members indicating who they should vote for. Large clubs may thus have a considerable say in who wins the election.
As for Bhatt, the chosen candidate, she resigned from the Elections and Referenda committee approximately 30 minutes after the elections and referenda committee met to hire of the Chief Returning Officer and the Deputy Returning Officer.
Bhatt admits she sought support from the caucus group, but declined to answer why she depended on club presidents for support in her decision to run for UTMSU President. Bhatt also declined to answer whether she felt she now has an advantage over other candidates.
According to VP External Henry Ssali, any student “who feels comfortable and qualified to run for any position should run and let [other] students decide who they want their representatives to be, instead of one that’s hand-picked by 6/10 people.”
Asked why he had come to the meetings if he disagreed with them so much, Ssali said, “I learned about this caucus group through the President’s text message, which indicated that I was required to attend a caucus meeting in the Ante Room at 7 p.m. As VP External, part of my mandate is to attend all meetings organized by the President and as such I attended to fulfill my duty.”
UTMSU President Joey Santiago could not be reached for comment.
VP Internal and Services Carole Au Yeung was one of several UTMSU executives who took part in the caucus meetings. Au Yeun sits on the Elections and Referendum committee and oversees the conduct and supervision of the Elections and Referenda of the UTMSU. Moreover, in her position as VP Internal and Services, Au Yeung participated in the hiring of the elections administrators, the Chief Returning Officer and the Deputy Returning Officer, both of which monitor the election, enforces the election and procedures codes to ensure a fair process.
According to the UTMSU Elections and Procedure code, “the Elections and Referenda Committee has the ability to overrule decisions made by the CRO.” The Elections and Procedure code further stipulates that “all committee members shall act impartially during the Election period. Failure to act impartially may result in removal and/or censure from the committee.”
As of press time, Au Yeu had still not answered emailed questions about whether she thought she could remain impartial during the election period after helping select which candidate the caucus should support.
Official nomination period for UTMSU spring elections begins today and ends March 5 at 5 p.m. Nomination forms can be picked up in Student Centre room 115 from Linda Feener.
Let the rat race begin.
Look on the bright side, at least UTMSU is not experiencing the high drama that is playing out at Scarborough Campus.
This is ridiculous. While I admit that things like this happen all the time in real life, I’m disappointed that the UTMSU would do it before nomination period and in secret. Why would regular students not be allowed here? How about presidents of small clubs?
Its a smart strategy.
Joey Santiago must have known that there was a lot of ambition happening in the executive. Rather than have a situation where the execs split the vote, supporters, volunteers and have a bitter election… someone figured whoever wins over the most club presidents will be the clear front runner (making it easier to get the support of volunteers, supporters, resources that are shared by all of them.)
This just smells of manipulation.
Just to note, i don’t accuse Joey of orchestrating this.
However the goal of this is to have these meetings is in order to have a front runner emerge. Because when you have bitter campaigns, a lot of trash hits the fan.
Sorry for the grammer mistakes.
Wow- is it a coincidence that all the big clubs who receive most of the club funding were invited to this secret group?
I love how the UTMSU which always jumps on the Medium after every editorial which disagrees with ‘their’ viewpoint (like Drop Fees Campaign) has decided to seal their lips on this particular matter and pretend like nothing happened.
I would love to hear the candidates who were involved explain their way out of this one. But guess what, the longer they wait to tell their side,the less I am going to believe their explanation. If you need that much time to come up with your reasoning when you’ve been portrayed in a bad light, that to me means you are trying to hide something. I wish these candidates the best of luck in trying to win back the student body’s respect, and I look forward to speaking with these candidates in the future about some other issues that have come to my attention.
I know where my towel is. Do you know where your grammar skills are?